![]() ![]() I’ve written rebuttals to things that Bart Erhman has done, for example. Shouldn’t you be engaging the more sophisticated critics of Christianity?” And I certainly intend to, I feel like I do do that in my debates, in my books. And you might be saying, “Well, Trent, why were you to talk about some of these things? Some of these are really low-hanging fruit. And so, these views bundled up in their research, it’s really fascinating. Maybe I guess in academia, it’s not wacky, it’s unusual or it’s counterintuitive. I feel like slime’s going to come down on me right now. These are people, some of whom were very respected biblical scholars even that came out with really… Wacky is a word that I… I love the word “wacky” by the way. So, that’s what I want to focus on, that these are not nobodies. Others are more well-published authors and they may be experts in one field, and then they try to apply their thinking style to the Bible and come out with unusual results. And by “academic,” some of these people were legitimate academics scholars in fields that were relevant to the study of scripture, or at least ancient history. ![]() You go to YouTube, go to Reddit, go to obscure message boards. You can find people with unusual views on all sorts of things on the internet, apparently. Now, you go on the internet, you can find all kinds of people who have unusual views about who Jesus is. And today, I want to talk about five wacky academic views of Jesus. ![]() ![]() I’m your host, Catholic Answers Apologist and Speaker Trent Horn. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |